HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 99222 keys protect the read method check against type
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-99222

keys: Protect the read method check against type removalCVE-2026-99222

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-99222 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in keys: Protect the read method check against type removal. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Nov 2, 2026Updated Nov 2, 2026Source checked Nov 2, 2026First seen by HOL Nov 2, 2026Material review Nov 2, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <e5f830ae6611cddbfc504c43f14155f60b63206a || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <ff11cfed85cbfdd7fe1185ebd18d2c7a8353ad8d || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <1486caee47b4909f52835a957c3293e970113e44 || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <ff44f1b303aa76a818d898e85c56ed4852c031e2 || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <6a36e2a1a017c51f8a8ad2a094566bad97c46a9b || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <3edc064069d07e7d37359fcb4d03d3bab15ee3ab || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <cf1af7df80e38bf58bd74c2cccce32fcbd1a596a || >=d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 <e2a2deda08d91644f5e30c17d267b1cdc5f124b2 || 7fa67aa30509ad0da72ac0f757aa76e53c0ea3de || 18779eac17b5df9dff57138d07631573553a41d4 || f1afcf9488fc45765e20e2047d3b776981900e0b || 212d3adb1af4e34acb158d6c6def370016a1011d || >=4.14.177 <4.15 || >=4.19.118 <4.20 || >=5.4.35 <5.5 || >=5.6.7 <5.7e5f830ae6611cddbfc504c43f14155f60b63206a, ff11cfed85cbfdd7fe1185ebd18d2c7a8353ad8d, 1486caee47b4909f52835a957c3293e970113e44, ff44f1b303aa76a818d898e85c56ed4852c031e2, 6a36e2a1a017c51f8a8ad2a094566bad97c46a9b, 3edc064069d07e7d37359fcb4d03d3bab15ee3ab, cf1af7df80e38bf58bd74c2cccce32fcbd1a596a, e2a2deda08d91644f5e30c17d267b1cdc5f124b2, 4.15, 4.20, 5.5, 5.7
Linux/Linuxgeneric5.7Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to e5f830ae6611cddbfc504c43f14155f60b63206a if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Nov 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Nov 2, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: keys: Protect the read method check against type removal keyctl_read_key() checks key->type->read without holding key->sem. A reference keeps the key alive, but does not pin the module containing its type. A surviving RxRPC key can therefore be read while AF_RXRPC is being unloaded: KEYCTL_READ task Module unload and key GC ---------------- ------------------------ lookup_user_key() permission / possession checks load key->type af_rxrpc_exit() unregister_key_type() GC: down_write(key->sem) GC: retype to key_type_dead GC: up_write(key->sem) unregister_key_type() returns free_module() read saved type's read member The final access can read freed module storage. The read invocation in __keyctl_read_key() is already protected by key->sem, but the earlier method check is outside that critical section. Move the method check into __keyctl_read_key(), after key_validate() and under its existing read hold on key->sem. The check and invocation then use the same protected type for length queries and every read retry. The GC cannot retype the key until the semaphore is released, and type unregistration waits for that GC pass before the module can be freed. Return -EOPNOTSUPP when validation succeeds and the type has no read method. A temporary buffer may now be allocated before this result; allocation and copying to userspace remain outside the semaphore.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • tracing: Hold trace_types_lock when resetting last boot data from readersSame linux/linux package
  • tracing: Hold trace_types_lock when updating modules in persistent instancesSame linux/linux package
  • Bluetooth: L2CAP: refuse __l2cap_chan_add if chan already has connSame linux/linux package
  • mm/damon/core: error damos_commit_quota_goal() for zero target_valueSame linux/linux package
  • ntfs: take invalidate_lock in ntfs_filemap_page_mkwrite()Same linux/linux package
  • ntfs: fix race between fallocate and mmap readsSame linux/linux package

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 2, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record