HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 111771 mcp typescript sdk server bearer authentication
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.8CVE-2026-111771GHSA-RVQ5-WWQV-78PQ

MCP TypeScript SDK: Server bearer authentication accepted tokens issued for another serviceCVE-2026-111771

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-111771 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.8) vulnerability in MCP TypeScript SDK: Server bearer authentication accepted tokens issued for another service. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @modelcontextprotocol/express (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/server (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 20, 2026Updated Oct 20, 2026Source checked Oct 20, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 20, 2026Material review Oct 20, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @modelcontextprotocol/express (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/server (npm), @modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@modelcontextprotocol/expressnpm>=2.0.0,<2.0.22.0.2
@modelcontextprotocol/sdknpm>=1.6.0,<1.32.01.32.0
@modelcontextprotocol/servernpm>=2.0.0,<2.3.02.3.0
@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacynpm>=2.0.0,<2.3.12.3.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @modelcontextprotocol/express, @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, @modelcontextprotocol/server.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @modelcontextprotocol/express to 2.0.2; @modelcontextprotocol/sdk to 1.32.0; @modelcontextprotocol/server to 2.3.0; @modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy to 2.3.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 20, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary In affected versions, the SDK's server-side bearer authentication had no way to check that a token was issued for your server (its audience). Where one authorization server issues tokens for several services, a valid token for another service was also accepted by your MCP server. ### Am I affected? Yes, if your HTTP server uses `requireBearerAuth()` or `verifyBearerToken()`, its authorization server also issues tokens for other services, and your `verifyAccessToken()` does not check the token's audience (`aud`) itself. Affected versions: - `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.6.0 through 1.31.0 - `@modelcontextprotocol/server` 2.0.0 through 2.2.0 - `@modelcontextprotocol/express` 2.0.0 through 2.0.1 - `@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy` 2.0.0 through 2.3.0 ### Fix Upgrade to: - 1.x: `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.32.0 or later - 2.x: `@modelcontextprotocol/server` 2.3.0 or later, together with `@modelcontextprotocol/express` 2.0.2 or later if you use it - `@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy` 2.3.1 or later **Upgrading alone changes nothing.** The patched versions add an `expectedResource` setting that is off by default. To turn the check on, make both of these changes together: 1. Pass the audience your authorization server puts in tokens for your server: `requireBearerAuth({ verifier, expectedResource: new URL('https://mcp.example.com/mcp') })`. 2. Return the token's audience from `verifyAccessToken()` as `AuthInfo.resource`, also a `URL`. A token for another service then gets `401`. With only the first change, every request gets `401`. If you cannot upgrade yet, reject any token whose `aud` does not include your server inside `verifyAccessToken()`. That closes the issue on every version.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • MCP TypeScript SDK: One HTTP request within the default size limit could exhaust server memory during validationSame @modelcontextprotocol/sdk package
  • MCP TypeScript server SDK: Shared transport or server instances delivered one HTTP client's messages to anotherSame @modelcontextprotocol/server package
  • Missing authorization in the WhatsApp channel in Kiro CrewAlso CWE-863
  • @angular/common: XSRF Token Leakage via URL Parsing Discrepancy in Angular HTTP Client (Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-66035)Same npm ecosystem
  • markdown-it: Quadratic-time rendering of a single multi-line link reference definition with default options (regression since 14.0)Same npm ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Tool Poisoning
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 20, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record