HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 67315 axios noproxy bypass for 0000 local addresses in
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-67315GHSA-F4GW-2P7V-4548

Axios: NO_PROXY bypass for 0.0.0.0 local addresses in axiosCVE-2026-67315

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-67315 records a Medium severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in Axios: NO_PROXY bypass for 0.0.0.0 local addresses in axios. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 20, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026Source checked Oct 16, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 3, 2026Material review Sep 1, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
axiosnpm>=1.15.0,<1.18.01.18.0
axiosnpm>=0.31.0,<0.33.00.33.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for axios, axios.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update axios to 1.18.0; axios to 0.33.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
Upstream source description

## Summary Axios versions containing `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` do not treat `0.0.0.0` as a local address when evaluating `NO_PROXY` rules. In Node.js applications that use `HTTP_PROXY` or `HTTPS_PROXY` together with `NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1` or similar, a request to `http://0.0.0.0:<port>/` can be routed through the configured proxy instead of bypassing it. The issue is exploitable when an attacker can influence the axios request URL or a followed redirect target, and when the proxy can reach or relay `0.0.0.0` to local services. This is a Node.js runtime proxy-routing issue, not a browser, install-time, or development-tooling issue. ## Impact Applications are affected when all of the following are true: - The application runs axios in Node.js with the HTTP adapter. - The process uses environment proxy variables such as `HTTP_PROXY` or `HTTPS_PROXY`. - The process uses `NO_PROXY` entries such as `localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, or `::1` to keep local traffic out of the proxy path. - Attacker-controlled input can influence the request URL or redirect target. - The configured proxy does not reject `0.0.0.0` and can reach the local destination. For plain HTTP targets, the proxy can receive the full request URL, headers, and body, and may be able to observe the local service response. HTTPS targets are less exposed because axios uses CONNECT tunneling in current versions. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality is limited to environment-derived proxy selection in the Node HTTP adapter: - `lib/adapters/http.js` calls `getProxyForUrl(location)` and then `shouldBypassProxy(location)` before applying the proxy. - `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` normalizes and compares `NO_PROXY` entries. - Explicit caller-provided `config.proxy` remains trusted caller configuration. - Browser, React Native, XHR, and fetch adapter behavior are not affected. ## Technical Details `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` defines local loopback equivalence through `isLoopback()`. The current implementation recognizes `localhost`, IPv4 `127.0.0.0/8`, IPv6 `::1`, and IPv4-mapped loopback forms, but it does not include `0.0.0.0`. At `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js:176`, axios treats two hosts as matching when both are considered loopback: ```js return hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost)); ``` Because `isLoopback('0.0.0.0')` returns `false`, `NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1` does not match `http://0.0.0.0:<port>/`. `lib/adapters/http.js:185-193` then applies the environment proxy. ## Proof of Concept of Attack ```js import http from 'http'; import axios from './index.js'; const listen = (handler, host = '127.0.0.1') => new Promise((resolve) => { const server = http.createServer(handler); server.listen(0, host, () => resolve(server)); }); const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve)); const origin = await listen((req, res) => res.end('origin'), '0.0.0.0'); let proxyRequests = 0; const proxy = await listen((req, res) => { proxyRequests += 1; res.end('proxied'); }); process.env.http_proxy = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxy.address().port}`; process.env.HTTP_PROXY = process.env.http_proxy; process.env.no_proxy = 'localhost,127.0.0.1,::1'; process.env.NO_PROXY = process.env.no_proxy; try { const direct = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${origin.address().port}/`); const zero = await axios.get(`http://0.0.0.0:${origin.address().port}/`); console.log({ direct: direct.data, zero: zero.data, proxyRequests }); } finally { await close(origin); await close(proxy); } ``` Expected safe behavior: both `127.0.0.1` and `0.0.0.0` bypass the proxy when the `NO_PROXY` policy is intended to cover local destinations. Observed behavior: `127.0.0.1` bypasses the proxy, while `0.0.0.0` is sent through the proxy. ## Workarounds - Add `0.0.0.0` explicitly to `NO_PROXY` where local addresses must bypass proxies. - Reject or normalize `0.0.0.0` in application URL validation before calling axios. - Set `proxy: false` on axios requests that must never use environment proxies. - Configure the proxy itself to reject `0.0.0.0`, loopback, link-local, and internal address ranges. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ### Summary `axios` versions 1.15.0–1.16.1 contain an incomplete loopback-address check in `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js`. The `isLoopback()` function correctly identifies `127.0.0.0/8` and `::1` as loopback addresses but does not recognise `0.0.0.0` — the IPv4 unspecified address, which routes to the local machine on Linux and macOS. An attacker who controls a URL passed to axios can use `http://0.0.0.0/<path>` to bypass proxy-based SSRF filtering that the application relies upon. ### Details ## Affected versions `>= 1.15.0, <= 1.16.1` The vulnerability was introduced in v1.15.0 when the `shouldBypassProxy` helper was added as a security improvement (PR #10661). --- ## Root cause **File:** `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` ```javascript // Line 1 — static allowlist (incomplete) const LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES = new Set(['localhost']); // ← 0.0.0.0 missing const isIPv4Loopback = (host) => { const parts = host.split('.'); if (parts.length !== 4) return false; if (parts[0] !== '127') return false; // ← 0.0.0.0: parts[0] = '0' → false return parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255); }; const isLoopback = (host) => { if (!host) return false; if (LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES.has(host)) return true; // ← '0.0.0.0' not in set if (isIPv4Loopback(host)) return true; // ← returns false for 0.0.0.0 return isIPv6Loopback(host); }; isLoopback('0.0.0.0') returns false. Node's WHATWG URL parser does not normalise 0.0.0.0 to 127.0.0.1. Other bypass forms are safe: new URL('http://0177.0.0.1/').hostname → '127.0.0.1' (octal), new URL('http://2130706433/').hostname → '127.0.0.1' (decimal), new URL('http://0x7f000001/').hostname → '127.0.0.1' (hex). Only 0.0.0.0 escapes normalisation. ### PoC 'use strict'; // Verbatim copy of relevant logic from axios v1.16.1 shouldBypassProxy.js const LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES = new Set(['localhost']); const isIPv4Loopback = (host) => { const parts = host.split('.'); if (parts.length !== 4) return false; if (parts[0] !== '127') return false; return parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255); }; const isLoopback = (host) => { if (!host) return false; if (LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES.has(host)) return true; return isIPv4Loopback(host); }; // 1. Show URL parser does NOT normalise 0.0.0.0 console.log(new URL('http://0.0.0.0/').hostname); // → '0.0.0.0' ← NOT normalised console.log(new URL('http://0177.0.0.1/').hostname); // → '127.0.0.1' ← normalised (safe) console.log(new URL('http://2130706433/').hostname); // → '127.0.0.1' ← normalised (safe) // 2. Show isLoopback fails for 0.0.0.0 console.log(isLoopback('0.0.0.0')); // → false ← BUG: should be true console.log(isLoopback('127.0.0.1')); // → true ← correct Verified output on Node.js v22 / axios v1.16.1: 0.0.0.0 ← NOT normalised by URL parser 127.0.0.1 ← octal normalised correctly 127.0.0.1 ← decimal normalised correctly false ← 0.0.0.0 not detected as loopback ⚠ true ← 127.0.0.1 correctly detected ### Impact Applications that: Accept user-supplied URLs and pass them to axios Use a proxy with NO_PROXY=localhost (or similar) for SSRF filtering …can be bypassed by supplying http://0.0.0.0/<path>. Axios routes the request through the proxy (shouldBypassProxy returns false). If the proxy itself does not filter 0.0.0.0, the connection reaches the local machine — exposing internal services such as cloud IMDS endpoints, internal admin panels, or microservice APIs. Fix Minimal (one line): - const LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES = new Set(['localhost']); + const LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES = new Set(['localhost', '0.0.0.0']); Comprehensive: const isIPv4Unspecified = (host) => host === '0.0.0.0'; const isLoopback = (host) => { if (!host) return false; if (LOOPBACK_HOSTNAMES.has(host)) return true; if (isIPv4Loopback(host)) return true; if (isIPv4Unspecified(host)) return true; // add this line return isIPv6Loopback(host); }; </details>

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Tandoor Recipes: Blind SSRF via AI provider URL (api_base)Also CWE-918
  • ckan-mcp-server: DataStore Table UI resource does not validate postMessage origin (in) and posts to targetOrigin "*" (out)Same npm ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-183, CWE-918
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 16, 2026
References
11 linked sources
Open source record