HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 90087 bluetooth do not leak an hciconn when a second le
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-90087

Bluetooth: do not leak an hci_conn when a second LE connect is rejectedCVE-2026-90087

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-90087 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in Bluetooth: do not leak an hci_conn when a second LE connect is rejected. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 17, 2026Updated Oct 30, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 17, 2026Material review Oct 30, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4 || ee23bb0e4315476413e4e1ed9c486d6f9472294d || da499d598cb84b45a2aa930dc9213dc9a746a81d || >=5.17.14 <5.18 || >=5.18.3 <5.192eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39, 7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4, 5.18, 5.19
Linux/Linuxgeneric5.19Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4 || ee23bb0e4315476413e4e1ed9c486d6f9472294d || da499d598cb84b45a2aa930dc9213dc9a746a81d || >=5.17.14 <5.18 || >=5.18.3 <5.198a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8, 2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39, 7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4, 5.18, 5.19
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <a78d16530c1538a215a827c7c3a4b408d6759bc0 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <78970b39529844b31df2949015f66752e17210fe || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4 || ee23bb0e4315476413e4e1ed9c486d6f9472294d || da499d598cb84b45a2aa930dc9213dc9a746a81d || >=5.17.14 <5.18 || >=5.18.3 <5.19a78d16530c1538a215a827c7c3a4b408d6759bc0, 78970b39529844b31df2949015f66752e17210fe, 8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8, 2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39, 7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4, 5.18, 5.19
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <42fe0278d05d75c405abad62dafaeec713cec2e2 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <a78d16530c1538a215a827c7c3a4b408d6759bc0 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <78970b39529844b31df2949015f66752e17210fe || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39 || >=c9f73a2178c12fb24d2807634209559d6a836e08 <7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4 || ee23bb0e4315476413e4e1ed9c486d6f9472294d || da499d598cb84b45a2aa930dc9213dc9a746a81d || >=5.17.14 <5.18 || >=5.18.3 <5.1942fe0278d05d75c405abad62dafaeec713cec2e2, a78d16530c1538a215a827c7c3a4b408d6759bc0, 78970b39529844b31df2949015f66752e17210fe, 8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8, 2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39, 7e1e4047200fd7519f9bdfe8a001437715e618b4, 5.18, 5.19

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 2eafcf310f4e0ad4f387881db01116bbe3cc0b39; Linux/Linux to 8a8585e421d06f878b33ef79f82cace0d485e3d8; Linux/Linux to a78d16530c1538a215a827c7c3a4b408d6759bc0; Linux/Linux to 42fe0278d05d75c405abad62dafaeec713cec2e2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 17, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 30, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 17, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: do not leak an hci_conn when a second LE connect is rejected create_le_conn_complete() decides whether the failed connection is still pending by comparing it against hci_lookup_le_connect(), which returns the first LE connection in BT_CONNECT. That is the same connection only while at most one is pending. Two can be pending. Connections created on the passive scan path sit in BT_CONNECT with HCI_CONN_SCANNING set and are invisible to hci_lookup_le_connect() until hci_le_create_conn_sync() clears the flag when their command is issued, so the -EBUSY guard in hci_connect_le() does not prevent a second connection from being queued while the first is still on the scan path. Whenever two connections are in BT_CONNECT at once, the lookup may return one connection while create_le_conn_complete() is reporting the failure of the other; the early exit then drops the error and hci_conn_failed() never runs on the connection that failed. The controller also rejects a second HCI_OP_LE_CREATE_CONN issued while another connection creation is still outstanding, per Core Spec Vol 4, Part E. The spec calls for Command Disallowed there; the bcm43438 observed here answers with an LMP/LL error code instead, which bt_to_errno() maps to the -EPROTO (-71) in the log below. The leaked connection stays in BT_CONNECT forever, and because hci_connect_le() refuses to dial while hci_lookup_le_connect() finds anything, every subsequent attempt to reach any peer fails with -EBUSY and no command reaches the controller at all. Seen on a bcm43438 with two BLE peers polled on the same interval (state 5 is BT_CONNECT; both handles are UNSET ones, allocated from the ida above HCI_CONN_HANDLE_MAX): Bluetooth: hci1: Opcode 0x2013 failed: -71 # hcitool con < LE 14:9C:EF:03:68:81 handle 3840 state 5 lm CENTRAL < LE C4:D3:6A:8C:B5:38 handle 3841 state 5 lm CENTRAL A btmon capture across the next ten minutes of connect attempts contains no HCI_OP_LE_CREATE_CONN at all; outgoing LE connections do not recover until the adapter is reset. With this change the same scenario fails the rejected connection cleanly and further connects to both peers go through. Ask about the connection itself instead of about the device.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.