Answer in brief
CVE-2026-95692 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in Out-of-Bounds Read and Incorrect IV Length Handling in AES-GCM-SIV. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps OpenSSL/OpenSSL (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps OpenSSL/OpenSSL (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL/OpenSSLgeneric | >=4.1.0 <4.1.1 || >=4.0.0 <4.0.4 || >=3.5.0 <3.5.10 | 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10 |
Published upstream
Nov 10, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Nov 10, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Nov 10, 2026
Issue summary: Setting an AES-GCM-SIV IV shorter than the expected nonce length via EVP_CipherInit_ex() may trigger a heap out-of-bounds read. Supplying a longer IV is silently truncated instead of rejected. Impact summary: An application passing a caller-supplied IV of the wrong length may crash or read beyond its buffer. Because trailing IV bytes are ignored, an attacker who knows one message and tag may forge messages under a different IV. CWE: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read Description: AES-GCM-SIV copies the caller-supplied IV or nonce into its internal state using a copy whose length is taken from the expected nonce size rather than from the length the caller actually provided. When the caller passes a shorter IV, the copy reads past the end of the caller's buffer; AddressSanitizer confirms a heap out-of-bounds read reached through EVP_CipherInit_ex() into ossl_aes_gcm_siv_init(). When the caller passes a longer IV, the implementation silently discards the trailing bytes instead of rejecting the length. The truncation breaks the binding between the IV and the computed authentication tag. An attacker who has observed a message and its tag under one IV can produce a message and tag that verify under a different IV whose first bytes match, since the surplus bytes never influence the computation. The message itself is unchanged, so this is a failure of IV commitment rather than a classic existential forgery. Only applications that call EVP_CipherInit_ex() (or the equivalent provider cipher initialization) with an IV length other than the standard 12 bytes for AES-GCM-SIV are affected. The severity is limited because the out-of-bounds read is small and attacker-controlled only in length, and the forgery requires an unusual IV length choice by the application. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as AES-GCM-SIV is not an approved algorithm.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.